<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for NewMusicShelf.com News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newmusicshelf.com/news/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newmusicshelf.com/news</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 17:53:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Caveat Compositor redux by DennisTobenski.com News &#8250; The Composer’s Guide to Doing Business: Competitions Pt 1: Application Fees</title>
		<link>http://newmusicshelf.com/news/2011/06/caveat-compositor-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-2234</link>
		<dc:creator>DennisTobenski.com News &#8250; The Composer’s Guide to Doing Business: Competitions Pt 1: Application Fees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 17:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmusicshelf.com/news/?p=309#comment-2234</guid>
		<description>[...] zero tolerance for this sort of thing. I&#8217;ve posted about a competition like this over at the NewMusicShelf, and can really only consider these sorts of things to be scams, no matter how well-meaning the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] zero tolerance for this sort of thing. I&#8217;ve posted about a competition like this over at the NewMusicShelf, and can really only consider these sorts of things to be scams, no matter how well-meaning the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Doing Business: DRM and Piracy by DennisTobenski.com News &#8250; The Composer&#8217;s Guide to Doing Business: Print vs. Digital</title>
		<link>http://newmusicshelf.com/news/2011/12/doing-business-drm-and-piracy/comment-page-1/#comment-1567</link>
		<dc:creator>DennisTobenski.com News &#8250; The Composer&#8217;s Guide to Doing Business: Print vs. Digital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmusicshelf.com/news/?p=389#comment-1567</guid>
		<description>[...] already written a big post on DRM and Piracy here, so I&#8217;ll just give the salient points with a little new [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] already written a big post on DRM and Piracy here, so I&#8217;ll just give the salient points with a little new [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Caveat Compositor redux by &#8220;Prelude No. 1&#8243; awarded Honorable Mention for the International Music Prize 2011. &#124; Garrett Shatzer</title>
		<link>http://newmusicshelf.com/news/2011/06/caveat-compositor-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-930</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Prelude No. 1&#8243; awarded Honorable Mention for the International Music Prize 2011. &#124; Garrett Shatzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 23:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmusicshelf.com/news/?p=309#comment-930</guid>
		<description>[...] Music Prize 2011. Normally I&#8217;d be thrilled for such a result. However, some people have recently called into question the &#8220;validity&#8221; of this award. I&#8217;m skeptical as well. It sounded somewhat fishy at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Music Prize 2011. Normally I&#8217;d be thrilled for such a result. However, some people have recently called into question the &#8220;validity&#8221; of this award. I&#8217;m skeptical as well. It sounded somewhat fishy at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Doing Business: DRM and Piracy by Jeffrey Quick</title>
		<link>http://newmusicshelf.com/news/2011/12/doing-business-drm-and-piracy/comment-page-1/#comment-874</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Quick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 01:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmusicshelf.com/news/?p=389#comment-874</guid>
		<description>We should be so lucky that people want to pirate us. Obviously, I&#039;m comfortable with the way you&#039;ve set this up.

I don&#039;t believe in intellectual property, as a concept. If something is property, it&#039;s property in perpetuity; it doesn&#039;t stop being property after a government-defined time (or worse, become not-property and then become property again, as in some of the Soviet works). That said, in an age where government cut special deals with all and sundry, a special privilege to control the revenue stream from my work seems fair to me, and I respect that privilege given to other creators as well.  That may well be intellectually bankrupt. But I&#039;d rather be intellectually bankrupt than literally bankrupt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should be so lucky that people want to pirate us. Obviously, I&#8217;m comfortable with the way you&#8217;ve set this up.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe in intellectual property, as a concept. If something is property, it&#8217;s property in perpetuity; it doesn&#8217;t stop being property after a government-defined time (or worse, become not-property and then become property again, as in some of the Soviet works). That said, in an age where government cut special deals with all and sundry, a special privilege to control the revenue stream from my work seems fair to me, and I respect that privilege given to other creators as well.  That may well be intellectually bankrupt. But I&#8217;d rather be intellectually bankrupt than literally bankrupt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Doing Business: DRM and Piracy by Chris B.</title>
		<link>http://newmusicshelf.com/news/2011/12/doing-business-drm-and-piracy/comment-page-1/#comment-873</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 00:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmusicshelf.com/news/?p=389#comment-873</guid>
		<description>Obviously, I agree with all this. Something else that strikes me is that the personal connection entailed by buying music directly from the composer (or through NMS which is about as minimal a middleman as there could be) is going to make people think really differently about the score they bought. When people pirate things that are distributed through giant media conglomerate, I think they maybe partly do it because doesn&#039;t feel like they&#039;re stealing from &lt;i&gt;somebody&lt;/i&gt;. When you&#039;ve had some personal contact with the actual human who created the thing you&#039;re buying, though, it seems to me like it&#039;s got to be much harder to turn around and rip that person off by pirating their work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously, I agree with all this. Something else that strikes me is that the personal connection entailed by buying music directly from the composer (or through NMS which is about as minimal a middleman as there could be) is going to make people think really differently about the score they bought. When people pirate things that are distributed through giant media conglomerate, I think they maybe partly do it because doesn&#8217;t feel like they&#8217;re stealing from <i>somebody</i>. When you&#8217;ve had some personal contact with the actual human who created the thing you&#8217;re buying, though, it seems to me like it&#8217;s got to be much harder to turn around and rip that person off by pirating their work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Doing Business: DRM and Piracy by Pete Guither</title>
		<link>http://newmusicshelf.com/news/2011/12/doing-business-drm-and-piracy/comment-page-1/#comment-872</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Guither</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 23:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmusicshelf.com/news/?p=389#comment-872</guid>
		<description>Extremely well said. The vast majority of people &lt;i&gt;want&lt;/i&gt; to pay for scores, scripts, royalties, etc., as long as the cost is reasonable and the process is easy. Complex DRM structures discourage participation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Extremely well said. The vast majority of people <i>want</i> to pay for scores, scripts, royalties, etc., as long as the cost is reasonable and the process is easy. Complex DRM structures discourage participation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Doing Business: Virtual Shelf Space by DennisTobenski.com News &#8250; Doing Business: Virtual Shelf Space</title>
		<link>http://newmusicshelf.com/news/2011/08/doing-business-virtual-shelf-space/comment-page-1/#comment-563</link>
		<dc:creator>DennisTobenski.com News &#8250; Doing Business: Virtual Shelf Space</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmusicshelf.com/news/?p=372#comment-563</guid>
		<description>[...] post originally appeared on the NewMusicShelf blog on August 6, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post originally appeared on the NewMusicShelf blog on August 6, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pricing: The Goldilocks Zone by Pricing: A Practical Approach &#124; NewMusicShelf.com News</title>
		<link>http://newmusicshelf.com/news/2010/12/pricing-the-goldilocks-zone/comment-page-1/#comment-313</link>
		<dc:creator>Pricing: A Practical Approach &#124; NewMusicShelf.com News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmusicshelf.com/news/?p=129#comment-313</guid>
		<description>[...] before I get into the math of it, I want to quickly paraphrase my post Pricing: The Goldilocks Zone where I talk about my philosophy on setting prices. Until now, I’ve set mine by asking myself two [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] before I get into the math of it, I want to quickly paraphrase my post Pricing: The Goldilocks Zone where I talk about my philosophy on setting prices. Until now, I’ve set mine by asking myself two [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Caveat Compositor redux by SGS</title>
		<link>http://newmusicshelf.com/news/2011/06/caveat-compositor-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>SGS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 00:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmusicshelf.com/news/?p=309#comment-302</guid>
		<description>Excellent post.  This is definitely a scam.  But, the paragraph about &quot;release and hold harmless&quot; is a standard contract provision, so it doesn&#039;t really make this any sleazier than it is.  Just %100, rather than %110, let&#039;s say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post.  This is definitely a scam.  But, the paragraph about &#8220;release and hold harmless&#8221; is a standard contract provision, so it doesn&#8217;t really make this any sleazier than it is.  Just %100, rather than %110, let&#8217;s say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Caveat Compositor by Caveat Compositor redux &#124; NewMusicShelf.com News</title>
		<link>http://newmusicshelf.com/news/2011/02/caveat-compositor/comment-page-1/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>Caveat Compositor redux &#124; NewMusicShelf.com News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 00:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmusicshelf.com/news/?p=199#comment-301</guid>
		<description>[...] post Caveat Compositor seems to be the most popular post here, so in keeping with the spirit of caveats and keeping an eye [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post Caveat Compositor seems to be the most popular post here, so in keeping with the spirit of caveats and keeping an eye [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
